News Croatian Centre for Earthquake Engineering (CCEE) joins GEM as Public Governor By: Apr 24, 2026 Jan 29, 2026 Share Facebook LinkedIn GEM has entered into a new partnership with the two joint bodies of the Croatian Centre for Earthquake Engineering (CCEE), strengthening collaboration with an institution that has played an important role in Croatia’s post-earthquake recovery and ongoing risk reduction efforts. Through the partnership, CCEE has joined GEM as a Public Governor, adding to the foundation’s public governance network. The partnership brings into GEM two connected bodies within the Croatian Centre for Earthquake Engineering: the CCEE at the Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb, and the CCEE Intervention Service. The collaboration reflects a combination of scientific support, applied research and post-disaster technical response. Established following the 2020 earthquakes in Croatia, the CCEE has contributed to recovery processes through collaboration with public authorities, technical initiatives aimed at reducing seismic vulnerability, and work to strengthen preparedness for future events. The Intervention Service, founded in 2021, was created to provide expert technical assistance after disasters, including field inspections of building damage and usability where civil engineering support is required. From GEM’s perspective, the partnership reflects a shared commitment to grounding earthquake risk reduction in local expertise and long-term institutional collaboration. It also reinforces the importance of connecting global risk science with institutions working directly in contexts where seismic risk is a lived and practical challenge. The timing is also notable, with Zagreb set to host the GEM Conference 2026 – From Faults to Future Scenarios on 23–25 June 2026. In that context, the partnership highlights the value of strong local institutions in shaping wider international discussions on seismic hazard, risk and resilience. This new membership further strengthens GEM’s engagement with public institutions and technical partners working at the intersection of science, practice and disaster risk reduction. No images found. GALLERY 1/0 VIDEO RELATED CONTENTS

You have chosen to request a demo on: Model Builder's Toolkit (oq-mbtk) First Name Last Name Email Company or Institution Name Country Sector Provide Details I accept the license terms and the conditions of products use. Email us at product@globalquakemodel.org if you're experiencing problems submitting this form or if you have any inquiries. Thank you. Request Thanks for submitting! You will be contacted as soon as possible Add answer here

You have chosen to request a demo on: Global Exposure Model First Name Last Name Email Company or Institution Name Country Sector Provide Details I accept the license terms and the conditions of products use. Email us at product@globalquakemodel.org if you're experiencing problems submitting this form or if you have any inquiries. Thank you. Request Thanks for submitting! You will be contacted as soon as possible Add answer here

News GEM and NormanMax Partner to Reduce Earthquake Risk By: Jul 9, 2024 Jun 28, 2024 Share Facebook LinkedIn The Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Foundation and NormanMax Insurance Solutions - a global leader in parametric insurance solutions have signed a sponsor agreement to help improve earthquake preparedness, recovery, and risk reduction worldwide. This collaborative effort, spanning from 2024 to 2027, underscores the shared commitment of both organisations to minimising earthquake losses and improving seismic risk assessments around the world. "At GEM, we strive to create open, transparent, and scientifically robust earthquake hazard and risk models. By partnering with NormanMax Insurance Solutions, a leading provider of parametric earthquake insurance solutions, we aim to bridge the gap between cutting-edge science and practical financial protection against the damaging effects of earthquakes around the world”, said Helen Crowley, GEM Secretary General. The agreement acknowledges the importance of a wide range of solutions for mitigating seismic risk, including improved building codes, emergency response plans, land-use planning and financial risk transfer. By supporting GEM's development of open-source software and global hazard and risk models, NormanMax will be contributing to achieving these goals. "NormanMax is deeply committed to supporting innovative solutions that reduce earthquake risk," stated Bradley Meier, CEO of NormanMax Insurance Solutions. "We are proud to partner with the GEM Foundation in their mission to enhance public understanding of seismic hazard and risk and empower communities and businesses with the tools they need to be prepared in the face of potential earthquakes. This aligns with our goal of helping global insureds reduce the protection gap through effective risk transfer products for earthquakes." The GEM and NormanMax partnership highlights the importance of collaboration between scientific and financial sectors in addressing global earthquake risk. Together, our organisations will help advance the development and application of pioneering risk assessment tools and resources, contributing to safer, more resilient communities worldwide. By combining GEM's expertise in seismic modeling with NormanMax's parametric insurance solutions, this alliance promises to set new standards in earthquake preparedness and recovery, ensuring a brighter and more secure future for all. About NormanMax Insurance Solutions NormanMax Insurance Solutions, located in Miami, Florida, is the coverholder for Lloyd’s of London NormanMax Syndicate 3939 utilizing revolutionary insurance technology to provide the best insurance solutions to our clients and provide an unparalleled customer service experience. With unrivaled parametric insurance solutions for hurricanes and earthquakes – and many more parametric solutions on the horizon – NormanMax Insurance Solutions provides clients with peace of mind for challenging natural catastrophes in an ever-hardening insurance marketplace. For more information, visit: https://www.normanmaxinsurancesolutions.com/ No images found. GALLERY 1/1 VIDEO RELATED CONTENTS

You have chosen to request a demo on: Africa Exposure First Name Last Name Email Company or Institution Name Country Sector Provide Details I accept the license terms and the conditions of products use. Email us at product@globalquakemodel.org if you're experiencing problems submitting this form or if you have any inquiries. Thank you. Request Thanks for submitting! You will be contacted as soon as possible Add answer here

Publications Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in India using cumulative damage index-based vulnerability functions Share Facebook LinkedIn Download 2025 | Peer-reviewed This study proposes a framework to evaluate probabilistic seismic risk of buildings in regions exposed to both crustal and subduction earthquakes. Ground motions from subduction earthquakes are typically longer in duration, causing higher damage to structure due to increased inelastic demand as compared to ground motions from crustal earthquakes having the same peak intensity. The increased vulnerability to structural damage from subduction earthquake ground motions needs to be accounted for in seismic loss assessment studies. This study investigates the same for India. The north and northeast of India are exposed to both crustal and continental subduction seismic sources, and Peninsular India is exposed to crustal seismic sources. Nonlinear analytical models are developed for a set of modern Indian code-compliant reinforced concrete special moment frame buildings located at 20 different sites in India. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) of building models using spectrally equivalent ground motions from crustal and subduction earthquakes is used for developing tectonic-region-type-specific (crustal and subduction) building vulnerability functions. The cumulative damage index is used as the engineering demand parameter to capture the increased inelastic demand from subduction earthquakes on buildings. For seismic risk assessment, the total seismic hazard at a site is separated into its contribution from crustal and subduction sources and combined with respective building vulnerability functions. The seismic risk of buildings is quantified by average annual loss ratio (AALR) through event-based probabilistic seismic risk analysis. For buildings located in high seismic zones of India, this study finds that AALR can be up to 40% higher on average as compared to studies not accounting for increased building vulnerability from subduction earthquakes.

You have chosen to request a demo on: Global Liquefaction Hazard First Name Last Name Email Company or Institution Name Country Sector Provide Details I accept the license terms and the conditions of products use. Email us at product@globalquakemodel.org if you're experiencing problems submitting this form or if you have any inquiries. Thank you. Request Thanks for submitting! You will be contacted as soon as possible Add answer here

News Advancing Seismic Safety: Updates on GEM’s Global Seismic Regulations Database Initiative By: Dec 18, 2024 Dec 4, 2024 Share Facebook LinkedIn The Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Foundation has been working on the Global Seismic Regulations Database and Mapping initiative since March 2024, a collaborative effort to document and analyze seismic design regulations worldwide. With initial studies focused on South America, this activity is already providing valuable insights into how building codes influence earthquake resilience. GEM is inviting public sector organizations, academic institutions, and technical experts to contribute data and join the effort to improve seismic safety globally. Progress to Date GEM’s initial focus has been on understanding the history and impact of seismic design regulations in seven South American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela. These efforts have revealed critical information about the evolution of building codes in these nations, the changes they introduced to structural design, and their representation in the current building stock, as reflected in the distribution of buildings across seismic code levels, ranging from lower to higher standards. The findings reveal that approximately only 20% of the total building stock - and 55% of reinforced concrete buildings - in these countries were constructed under some level of seismic design regulation. Key Highlights: Chile : A regional leader in seismic code development, Chile was the first country to incorporate seismic design considerations in the 30s and has maintained robust modern regulations since the 70s, establishing itself as one of the most prepared nations in the region. Venezuela and Ecuador : The development of seismic codes in Venezuela has followed a trajectory similar to that of Chile, making it one of the first countries in the region to introduce seismic regulations, with Ecuador following closely behind. The transitions between low, moderate, and high code levels in both countries have been closely aligned with global advancements in seismic standards. However, compared to Chile, both countries are estimated to have lower levels of code enforcement. Notably, Ecuador has a significantly higher percentage of its building stock constructed under some level of seismic design regulation compared to Venezuela. Nevertheless, Venezuela has a larger total number of buildings than Ecuador. Bolivia : Bolivia was the last country in South America to introduce a mandatory seismic design code. As a result, it has the highest percentage of buildings among the analysed countries that do not comply with any seismic regulation. Colombia: Colombia's first mandatory seismic code was introduced after the 1980s, reflecting the design standard advancements of that era. Consequently, a significant portion of Colombia's building stock constructed after the 1980s is classified under moderate and high seismic design levels. However, due to the relatively recent introduction of its first code, a considerable percentage of the inventory consists of buildings that do not comply with the country's seismic regulations. Peru and Argentina: Both countries implemented their first seismic design regulations in 1970, and they exhibit similar levels of code enforcement. However, in Peru, a higher percentage of the total building stock has been constructed under some level of seismic design regulation compared to Argentina. By linking building stock to seismic code levels - ranging from no design to high code considerations - GEM has created models that represent the percentage of buildings constructed under different standards’ levels. Structures classified as “no code” are particularly vulnerable, often lacking essential provisions to resist seismic forces. In contrast, those built under “high code” standards are designed to perform adequately during ground shaking. These models not only provide a more comprehensive input for seismic risk assessments but also serve as valuable tools for understanding the critical role of robust construction practices in saving lives, reducing economic losses, and enhancing community resilience against earthquake risks. What’s Next The next phase of the initiative will expand to additional regions and countries and refine existing models with more detailed data. GEM also plans to continuously update the database, also in collaboration with GEM associate partner UNESCO, to reflect new regulations, ensuring it remains a dynamic and reliable resource for engineers, urban planners, and policymakers. These efforts aim to promote safer construction practices and support the development of risk-reduction strategies worldwide. A Call to Collaborate This initiative highlights the importance of understanding and implementing seismic regulations as a key part of protecting communities from earthquake risks. GEM invites public sector partners, academics, and private organisations to contribute to this growing resource or explore opportunities to collaborate as sponsors or technical partners. Together, we can expand the reach of this vital work and help ensure that vulnerable communities are better prepared. For more information or to discuss partnership opportunities, visit GEM's seismic regulations page: https://www.globalquakemodel.org/national-seismic-regulations . No images found. GALLERY 1/3 VIDEO RELATED CONTENTS

You have chosen to request a demo on: ISC - GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue First Name Last Name Email Company or Institution Name Country Sector Provide Details I accept the license terms and the conditions of products use. Email us at product@globalquakemodel.org if you're experiencing problems submitting this form or if you have any inquiries. Thank you. Request Thanks for submitting! You will be contacted as soon as possible Add answer here

You have chosen to request a demo on: South Africa Hazard First Name Last Name Email Company or Institution Name Country Sector Provide Details I accept the license terms and the conditions of products use. Email us at product@globalquakemodel.org if you're experiencing problems submitting this form or if you have any inquiries. Thank you. Request Thanks for submitting! You will be contacted as soon as possible Add answer here